Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Copper

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETED as nn-bio. I've largely taken your advices here, but agree that asserting someone is a pro wrestler is just asserting that person's profession and is not an assertion of notability (which would hve to be within that profession). -Splash^talk 23:15, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sam Copper

Problem:Not in an encyclopedic format, nor did any useful hits on Google. [1] Molotov (talk) 19:03, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

• Very close to an nn-bio. Delete. --fvw* 19:06, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete I'd say it's more than close to a nn-bio... it actually qualifies as one.--Isotope23 19:08, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per Isotope23 CLW 19:11, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

I've now tagged it as an nn-bio CLW 19:45, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.