Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam's Dance Troupe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:08, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sam's Dance Troupe

  ATTENTION!

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus among Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

Nonetheless, you are welcome to participate and express your opinions. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}}

A bunch of high school age kids who dance. Lots of words on the page, but that that one sentence sums the whole thing up. WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC are close to being relevant by analogy and this doesn't come even close. SchmuckyTheCat 07:26, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete as a non notable group. Vegaswikian 07:32, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete a7.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 07:42, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. CrypticBacon 07:57, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete CSD A7. -- Samir ∙ TC 08:06, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete While this article cites sources, a Google search for "Sam's Dance Troupe" comes up with nothing outside Wikipedia. [1].Capitalistroadster 08:42, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable vanity biography, unverifiable. Note that a couple articles now refer to this one (use Whatlinkshere). —Quarl (talk) 2006-02-28 09:00Z
  • Delete, per Cap & Quarl. Not a speedy. PJM 12:21, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

KeepThis is a valid article that I have investigated. --Bobjoe107 02:17, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep, This page has been vandalized several times due to its homosexual themes, which may fuel the notion that this is a vanity page. However, the page's claims are verifiable and cited, and the group seems to be a significant and legitimate organization, at least in its respective community. -- Facepaint 11:36, February 29 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, I may not have "Wikipedia street credibility", but I can personally testify to the legitimacy of this page. SDT has had a huge influence in our community as a source of cultural empowerment. It would be a crime to the gay community to remove this wealth of information. Edit it, abridge it, and criticize it, just don't delete it. Leroy Jenkins 02:42, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
    Leroy Jenkins (talk · contribs) has only contributed to this AFD —Quarl (talk) 2006-03-02 06:24Z
  • Oh, come on people. Speedy delete as attack page. Try actually reading the article. Actually, on second thought, don't. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:26, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • oh for the love of god this CLEARLY fits Speedy Deletion guidelines. and fails both bio and music standards. Since none of the members of the group are notable enough to get an article... the group itself cannot be notable enough. nuke it all ready and get on with editing an ENCYCLOPEDIA.  ALKIVAR™ 01:32, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, possible speedy as {{nn-club}}. See also what Starblind wrote. Stifle 22:40, 3 March 2006 (UTC)\
  • Keep, There was an aticle about the founder Sam Ross but is was deleted. It meets WP:MUSIC standards. --SanjayRajputs 00:02, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
    • This users only contribution to Wikipedia is this AfD. SchmuckyTheCat 00:07, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete as non-credible. Mhking 00:15, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, nn. Bump and grind it into oblivion. Ronabop 03:32, 4 March 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.