The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:08, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Not notable bordering on possible hoax or original research. An internet search yields few hits, most of them traceable back to this article. Glendoremus 18:42, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete, unsourced. Even if true, this does not belong here.--Ioannes Pragensis 21:15, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Edison 16:22, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.