Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salpointe catholic high school
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep --Allen3 talk 16:18, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Salpointe catholic high school now moved to Salpointe Catholic High School
nn schoolcruft' Y0u (Y0ur talk page) (Y0ur contributions) 19:46, July 24, 2005 (UTC) Keep I apologize for nominating. I mistakenly belived that precedent was to delete secondary schools with a few exceptions. Y0u (Y0ur talk page) (Y0ur contributions) 19:42, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep -Although the page needs much work and more information, its limited information merits its inclusion as a source of reference.--68.84.203.76 07:09, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
Speedy delete substub. Dunc|☺ 21:06, 24 July 2005 (UTC)- Strong delete no encyclopediac content. Unfortunately not technically eligable for a speedy under WP:CSD. DES 22:28, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - I fixed it up some so I think it fits the keeping policy for NPOV, etc.
Actually move to Salpointe Catholic High School--gren 22:32, 24 July 2005 (UTC)- Still contains no notable content. Still Delete. DES 22:38, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- I understand your article -- but instead of nonesense it now is the classic argument over school deletionism or keepinimism gren 22:45, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- Granted. I am in most cases a mergist, but on primary and secondary schools I am a deletionist, absent something quite unusual, i don't think such schools are notable enough to warrent inclusion. No one ever said this was patent nonsense, or at least I never did. The annon user says "content is low" but what notable coneten could there ever be for such an article? DES 22:58, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- Oh, I said it was nonesense, it was just a dead media link and no context. Nothing is notable in the normal encyclopedic sense, but argument I follow is NPOV information makes it worthwhile. But, this is why there is still a debate on this subject I guess. gren 23:24, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- Granted. I am in most cases a mergist, but on primary and secondary schools I am a deletionist, absent something quite unusual, i don't think such schools are notable enough to warrent inclusion. No one ever said this was patent nonsense, or at least I never did. The annon user says "content is low" but what notable coneten could there ever be for such an article? DES 22:58, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- I understand your article -- but instead of nonesense it now is the classic argument over school deletionism or keepinimism gren 22:45, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- Still contains no notable content. Still Delete. DES 22:38, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - I admit the content is low but more can be added over time. I don't see why High Schools should be excluded from wiki. Then of course, I'm just an anonymous user :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.186.40.146 (talk • contribs) 18:41, 24 July 2005
- Keep per anonymous user. Kappa 22:58, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. This is silly. -- Visviva 23:16, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Perfectly good school stub. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 04:59, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. Added some notables from their own Hall of Fame. No A-listers, but a few head honchoes, opera soloists and whatnot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tony Sidaway (talk • contribs) 05:45, 25 July 2005
- Keep on nominating these. Maybe next week we can try reinventing the wheel. —RaD Man (talk) 05:16, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
- Taco. For the usual reasons. --Carnildo 07:31, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep perfectly reasonable stub Salsb 13:01, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep for reasons already stated. Unfocused 13:46, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep — Time for a boiler-plated notice message to people who nominate... RJH 14:47, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep A good start. CalJW 21:35, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep per the above keeps. DS1953 03:05, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep per Wikipedia schools arguments.-Poli (talk • contribs) 20:47, 2005 July 27 (UTC)
- Frying pan to the head of the nominator for nominating an article whose topic is near-universally considered to be notable. Oh, and Keep. Almafeta 13:34, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep on keeping schools. Grace Note 00:17, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
