Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sallie Krawcheck

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep as rewritten. —Cleared as filed. 21:44, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sallie Krawcheck

Delete I suspect this article is a personal attack. It is non-encyclopedic at any rate. The original stub said, "During that time she was admired within the organisation for her fawning entourage and excellent taste in knee-high boots." Ruby 01:01, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete probably an attack, and would be an A7-bio at any rate. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:10, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

I nominated it for AfD because I'm not clear that "formerly a highly respected equities analyst" means she is no longer respected, or no longer an equities analyst, and I also don't know if CFO of Citigroup is notable enough. Ruby 01:15, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete – looks like a year-old attack (between the boots and formerly highly respected). ×Meegs 01:53, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Keep, hopefully wiping the history as Thivierr suggests below (or delete & rewrite the two sentences to ensure the edits are credited). She's one of the top people at "the biggest company in the world", Citigroup, and is in the news a lot as one of their mouthpieces. ×Meegs 20:24, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per nom as personal attack. --Lockley 05:31, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete personal attack Addie 14:51, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as personal attack. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 14:54, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: The attack has been removed (an admin may wish to delete history). This woman is very notable, based on Google web and news results. --Rob 19:49, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Thivierr's comments. Sauvastika 23:07, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep only Thivierr's 1/30 rewrite; cleanse history of all other revisions. Chick Bowen 00:42, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as noted above, though the article may have been an attack in the past, I think her article, properly cleaned up, is a fine entry. CFO of one of the world's largest financial companies is of sufficient importance. --JACooks 01:22, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable woman executive - thanks to Thiverr for the rewrite and look at options for the history. Capitalistroadster 02:17, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.