Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saleh ildirim

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:00, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Saleh ildirim

Saleh ildirim (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not a notable person and the article is in really bad shape and a google search brings up next to nothing (neutral sources that is) except the same single article written by a freelance journalist, which can hardly be considered reliable.Azerbaijani 17:04, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

The article is well written, objective and deals with a leading figure in an important political movement. It's referenced by an article written by a veteran respected journalist published in a big city daily city newspaper. The initiative to delete this article appears baseless and possibly politically motivated.--Megaforcemedia 15:03, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - There are articles on many many people, that does not mean they are all notable enough to have an ENCYCLOPAEDIA article written about them. Furthermore, I see that you have added POV into the article.Azerbaijani 18:35, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Not notable. --alidoostzadeh 01:38, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Not notable at all. I even asked from some Azeris who are living in Montreal (The city where he is living). None of them knows him. The Azeri community in Montreal is less than 1700 people. This may show how notable this guy is.--Pam55 01:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete That's a Hoax article , Article information cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources and most of all , Subject fails to meet the relevant notability guidelines Wikipedia:Notability (people).Alborz Fallah 08:46, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.