Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sal Brinton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus/default keep. The closeness of her defeat makes an exception to the typical candidate requirements seem at least somewhat reasonable; since definitive consensus isn't here, this is a "when in doubt, don't delete" case. Xoloz 21:35, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sal Brinton

Non-notable failed candidate doktorb _words^deeds 09:23, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - fails WP:BIO. MER-C 09:29, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - she's done a lot more than fight Watford for the Lib Dems, and she very nearly won it too, with what looks like an above average swing. It's the rest of her carreer that counts, though. She looks to me like an up and coming member of what used to be called "the great and the good". BTLizard 11:23, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment That may be true but you need to look at WP:BIO, which this non-notable failed candidate obviously falls down on...doktorb _words^deeds 08:00, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. All things she's done are of borderline notability. The JPS^{talk to me} 12:07, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep. These several borderline things add up to a weak establishment of notability in my book. Dekimasu 10:44, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.