Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sal Brinton (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. GDonato (talk) 16:40, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sal Brinton

Sal Brinton (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Yet another parliamentary candidate. The closeness of the result and reselection are not notable features in and of themselves. There are thousands of such candidates in elections around the globe. Timrollpickering 20:19, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

keep: Whilst the candidacy stuff is at the top of the article and is insufficient, the other information - positions, honorary awards, etc - suggests that there are other reasons she can be confirmed as notable. --AlisonW 23:19, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

• Week Keep The non-political stuff (that isn't in the current version of the article) looks like it might be notable. OTOH, they have had almost a year to clean it up. jonathon 00:58, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep Not much, but notable.Tiptopper 00:26, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.