This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 00:24, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete personal revalation like original research is unencyclopedicTjc
Delete but thank you for sharing, Barbara Ann. --Wetman 04:17, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Comment: This was apparently either never listed on vfd or removed out of process, so I'm bringing it to today's page for resolution. —Korath (Talk) 00:07, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, original research. Megan1967 08:24, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete, original research, factually disputed, potentially offensive, unprovable, not verified, invitation for vandalism. Oliver Keenan 14:53, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.