Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sagal Twins

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was close with status quo; that is, a disambiguation page. —Kurykh 17:33, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sagal Twins

Sagal Twins (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article is superfluous in light of the existing individual pages for the twins, Jean Sagal and Liz Sagal. They are sufficiently notable on their own, and the moniker "Sagal Twins" does not go above and beyond their own notability. It should be noted that all three articles contain nearly the same wording (some paragraphs verbatim), further making this page redundant. Delete without redirect. Eliz81(talk)(contribs) 00:15, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep article but add references, then Redirect Jean Sagal and Liz Sagal to this article. That would seem to be the most logical choice, seeing as all three articles are pretty much the same. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 00:41, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletions. —Eliz81(talk)(contribs) 00:44, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • I concur with what TPH (if I may call you that) has said. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 01:16, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep as disambiguation page only. The section on Double Trouble has much detail on the TV show's plot that doesn't even belong in a biography and the last half is about each one of them separately. This material either belongs in their separate articles, the TV series article, but not here. Unless they're infants or constantly in the news as twins I'm opposed to treating two adults as one entity. --Dhartung | Talk 01:20, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment rewritten as DAB page. I also rewrote both individual pages. Whoever wrote this couldn't resist listing the career highlights of every single person mentioned, which is grating enough when my 70-year-old father goes on at dinner, and definitely is not encyclopedic. --Dhartung | Talk 10:14, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.