Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sadorexia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:14, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sadorexia

This page seems very suspicious! The only hits on Google appear to reference the website at http://www.sadorexia.com , and the website itself seems to be some kind of joke/parody/spoof, trying to get at those in the BDSM lifestyle (and even if this is serious, it surely counts as original research). WANBULA seems to be a genuine organisation, but I can't find a reference of sadorexia on their pages (although I can't read Spanish to be certain). If this was a genuine eating disorder, there would surely be more references to it. (I'm also at a loss to see how masochism is a slimming technique...) Mdwh 04:11, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete unless someone can point to actual medical validity. OR, Vanity. I haven't heard of anyone using any form of sex as an appetite suppressant. Also, over-use of irrelevant NSFW images [1] makes me lean more heavily on thinking it's a hoax. --Interiot 04:36, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. We can probably shed this. -- JJay 11:37, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. If the talk page is to be believed, the entire article is an extract from http://www.sadorexia.com meaning that there is no GFDL content on this page at all. —gorgan_almighty 15:28, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. no official diagnostical category, only sources mentioned above, although WANBULA is definitly talking about it, but that is not enough for creating a new diagnostical category ... --Enfiladissa 15:28, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.