Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sad rea;;y

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was de;ete. - Mailer Diablo

[edit] Sad rea;;y

Non-notable typocruft from one single webforum. De;ete. DS 17:00, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Web-cruft not notable outside of its own forum. Fernando Rizo T/C 17:47, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
• De;ete. Non-notab;e neo;ogism. -- BD2412 ^ta;k 17:49, August 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete -- for the reasons already presented --Mysidia (talk) 19:25, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per above Soltak 20:07, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
• Del;;ete — Whoops, typo. RJH 20:16, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and ban creator for time wasting. Erwin Walsh

  We don't do that, but I think forumcruft is on its way to becoming the next speedy criterion. Gazpacho

• Delete. WP:N, WP:V.—Encephalon | ζ | Σ 21:40:18, 2005-08-14 (UTC)
• De;ete. Non-notab;e. --GraemeL 22:54, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. Votes were altered by 24.158.168.207 (talk · contribs) on 22:58, 14 August 2005. User has been warned on talk page. --Alan Au 23:37, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.