Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacagawean

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Transwiki. Cbrown1023 02:51, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sacagawean

Sacagawean (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

belongs in Wikitionary, useless Adam 04:34, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Transwiki to Wiktionary. So tagged. MER-C 05:05, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Sacagawea. It's common to make redirects from other parts of speech, and I can see this redirect as being potentially useful. For example, if I was reading and came across the word "Sacagawean", I'd probably look it up in WP. Of course, you can still copy to Wiktionary as well if you think they would want it. delldot | talk 06:21, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect, dictdef. MaxSem 07:20, 31 December 2006 (UTC) No, delete. MaxSem 07:24, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Transwiki, and use as redirect. There's nothing to stop us deleting (well, transwiki'ing) what's here, and keeping the title as a redirect. After all, if "Australian" can be used as a redirect to Australia, and "Einsteinian" is a redirect to Albert Einstein, why not use Sacagewean as a redirect to Sacagewea? Grutness...wha? 00:37, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
    • Is it even possible to do a trans-wiki redirect? =O.o= --Dennisthe2 04:48, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
      • I think Grutness is saying we should transwiki what's there now, and redirect Sacagawean to the Wikipedia article Sacagawea. delldot | talk 05:13, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Transwiki with maybe a redirect. Though it kind of seems like a neologism.... --Dennisthe2 01:24, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Transwiki to Wiktionary. Davidpdx 11:24, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
  • How does one do a transwiki? My opinion is that this should be moved to Wikitionary (is that what a transwiki is?) and this page be a redirect to Sacagawean. Just my two cents, Adam 17:56, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.