Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabsay Favourite Kaun Awards
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete all, including those added late, per consensus. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 22:02, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Sabsay Favourite Kaun Awards
Was originally tagged for speedy deletion under A7, but declined on technical grounds (didn't fit neatly enough). I believe that this article and the one that follows are ripe for deletion, as they don't even try to establish notability, and they border on plain old advertising. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:39, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related page for the same reason as stated above:
- Delete. I had originally tagged the same for speedy under A7. No assertion of notability. I am also nominating the following related pages, apart from the ones nominated by SchuminWeb:
- Sabsay Favourite Comedian Award (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Sabsay Favourite Heroine Award (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Sabsay Favourite Hero (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Sabsay Favourite Naya Hero Award (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Sabsay Favourite Nayi Heroine Award (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Sabsay Tez Sitara Award (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Electronz (talk) 15:22, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nominated pages tagged, leading to this AFD discussion. SchuminWeb (Talk) 07:20, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete all due to lack of sources, for a start. Stifle (talk) 18:47, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 21:43, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Keep article asserts notability. It does need sources, but I suspect those would be in languages other than English, which makes finding them more difficult. Edward321 (talk) 03:55, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per Stifle. "Asserting notability" is only good enough to avoid a speedy deletion, but the lack of sources makes those claims suspect, fails WP:V, and will ultimately result in deletion. coccyx bloccyx(toccyx) 18:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
