Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabitha Kumari 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:30, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Sabitha Kumari

Sabitha Kumari (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

This is a relisting of the previous AfD, which was compromised by sockpuppetry. Nominator's Soman's rationale for deletion was lack of reliable, non-blog sources. Jéské ^{(v^_^v +2 Pen of Editing)} 07:29, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

• (copypasted from old afd) Comment: to my count, there is currently 4 news sources; DNA, The Statesman and 2 Telegraph articles. The Statesman mentions that S.K. led a squad in West Bengal, but no bio info. [1] says that she's a woman in her 20s from Andhra Pradesh. [2] says that she's a woman in her early 20s from Jharkhand. [3] goes into more details. One can suppose that all of the info originates from the Intelligence Branch (IB) of the West Bengal police. I find that there is a real problem of verifiablity here. Also, an open question is whether being a squad commander (leading tens of soldiers) is enough notability for a bio article. Could there be any confirmation of position inside the party? I'd say that being a state committee or central committee member would be a minimum for notability of a leader inside the party. --Soman (talk) 08:30, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
• Comment I initially voted to delete but after seeing the "news" I am convinced that she is really notable because she is supposedly the first woman squadron leader of these rebel groups and seem to have a very important effect where she is operating. It qualifies as a stub now Taprobanus (talk) 16:40, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
• Weak Keep While there isn't tons of press coverage, there is enough to suggest that she might be notable. Dgf32 (talk) 20:22, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep it has been adequately edited & sourced from the earlier BLP state. DGG (talk) 16:28, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• Weak keep. Appears to meet the criteria for notability at WP:BIO, although I'm not familiar enough with the cited sources to know for certain whether they are reliable or not. --Dachannien^Talk_Contrib 21:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.