Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SWCity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 12:35, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] SWCity

Virtual community with 20 members, no more significant than a small MUD or web forum

  • Delete. Gazpacho 03:47, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete no media attention claimed, 20 members, 5,246,179 alexa rating, I'd say they fail all 3 things in WP:WEB. --Pboyd04 03:53, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Obviously not notable. - Bootstoots 03:57, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Please keep no, this is notable, it is WIDELY known by the activeworlds community which has thousands of users. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kol65 (talk • contribs) (Kol65 was original author of article)
    • Delete; *known* could mean "heard of it once"; a few thousand "knowing" of it doesn't make it notable. Just 20 *active members* suggests it isn't significant. Merge and redirect also acceptable; info may be worthwhile as small section in larger article. Fourohfour 10:56, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete 20 members != thousands. NN Search4Lancer 04:28, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per NN or Merge with Active Worlds. VegaDark 07:25, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as per extension of nn-bio. Shall I? --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 12:03, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete under New! IMPROVED! A7. Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 18:32, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as per it's own admissions of tinynes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lotusduck (talk • contribs)
  • Delete, it may qualify for a Speedy under CSD:A7 per club, but I am unsure. -- ReyBrujo 02:08, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Wow, that is VERY NN. - Liontamer 09:05, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.