Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STALLZ

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 23:01, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] STALLZ

STALLZ (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable musician - no independent evidence of notability provided other than a MySpace page. Reads like self-promotional spam. Mattinbgn/ ^talk 06:03, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Mattinbgn/ ^talk 06:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Comment PROD removed - no explanation given -- Mattinbgn/ ^talk 06:05, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Hirohisat ^Talk 06:33, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: near-certainly a self-made vanity page. "His own social oppression", good grief!--Yeti Hunter 08:12, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Terribly written advertisment that makes no attempt to assert notability - because there is none! Giggy ^Talk 09:53, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Pour petrol over and light using a flaming Bunsen burner - yep. -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 10:03, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete It does not seem to satisfy Wikipedia: notability (music). Seems like it may have been speedied before. While it makes an assertion of notability in this version, it doesn't seem verifiable. --Moonriddengirl 11:40, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Moonriddengirl has already cited Wikipedia: notability (music), so I suppose I'll just have to cite Wikipedia:No one cares about your garage band. Iain99 14:43, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination it is a vanity page and fails MUSIC guidelines. Burntsauce 18:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Per nom. I tried to be funny but the article shames me. -WarthogDemon 00:46, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - clearly just an advertisement.--Grahamec 01:51, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, a true MC? More like a true... uhh... dee-lete? Sorry. Lankiveil 11:20, 13 August 2007 (UTC).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.