Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SPCMDCON.SYS
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:28, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] SPCMDCON.SYS
Wikipedia is not a repository for every single piece of minutia that exists in the world. ghits: [1] NMChico24 13:49, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- It's not minutia. It's not irrelevant. It's for those who have booted up their systems, crashed, saw SPCMDCON.SYS onscreen and said, "What the hell is that?" Gp75motorsports 14:04, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- Please actually click on the link and read the guideline. Thank you. --NMChico24 14:15, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment It's not very clear from the article what SPCMDCON actually is. Context is not clear and appears to contradict itself: It is an automatic crash that is triggered when the system becomes outdated: does this mean that if I don't run Windows Update my will system crash? However, you cannot initiate SPCMDCON manually. The computer will not recognize it as an executable command due to its nonexistence. If it's non-existent, how can it harm my computer, and how can it even run in the first place? Is there a relevant article to merge this into? Yngvarr (t) (c) 14:22, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- You know what? There probably is. I'll search for one and if I don't find it, I'll do that. (change of mind) Nah. I'll fix it now. Thanks!
- Done! Check it. Gp75motorsports 14:34, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as OR and contradictory information per nom, unless it can be merged as suggested above. Hersfold (t/a/c) 14:40, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as original research and opinion that is ill-informed and mostly wrong. This driver is an essential component of the Windows NT (and above) Recovery Console, which this could optionally be redirected toward. --Dhartung | Talk 18:13, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, unless some references put in - this is almost worse than the one line porn star bios. What does it mean? --Rocksanddirt 22:37, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - and how can somebody have suggested this non-page to be merged in Page fault? are you kidding? --Godzillante 21:22, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Actually, I just found out what it was. Apparently I was misinformed before. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gp75motorsports (talk • contribs) 23:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
NEWS FLASH-I've got a few details on the way from [[2]], so don't delete it yet. I'm hoping these guys are all they're hyped up to be.
- I've added those details. I'll probavbly need someone to verify them and see if they're true.
~~Gp75motorsports~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gp75motorsports (talk • contribs) 10:35, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.