Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SORBS.US
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 15:45, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] SORBS.US
This article turns up 619 google hits for sorbs.us, one google hit (the site itself) for "Sorry Ole Reverse Blocking Systems" the main header, was prodded and removed without comment Crazynas t 02:05, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: The original author keeps reverting the page, removing tags and the talk page edits. Ryulong 02:09, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I see no grounds for a speedy delete, the blocking of the account should take care of that (perhaps the page should be semi-protected). In any event, there are no sources and there are never going to be any. Jon513 02:14, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - SORBS is notable. A wannabe is not. — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib Reverts 02:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Kari Hazzard (T | C) 03:12, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - No demonstration of notability ever after one was requested via talk page and page tags. Original author reverted the tags and blanked the talk page instead of responding to the request. With all the energy they wasted blanking, they could have rewritten the article 50 times, if there was really an article to write. = - Stephanie Daugherty (Triona) - Talk - Comment - 03:19, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Alias Flood 03:47, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, doesn't seem to be notable. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 04:59, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. R.E. Freak 06:25, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.