Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SIPphone

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete. Its not clear that Gizmo Project is the best target for any merge given that Gizmo Project instant messaging software is only part of what the company provides. Further discussion should be held on the articles talkpage if a merge is felt needed and request made at WP:RM. WjBscribe 06:39, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] SIPphone

SIPphone (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

fails WP:NOTE Misterdiscreet 17:29, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete - doesn't assert notability. MER-C 08:55, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. I added a reference from the New York Times. --Eastmain 13:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
interesting. i didn't know the new york times wrote press releases for companies. Misterdiscreet 14:24, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 12:30, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep The NYT reference is enough. The founder and the context also seem notable. YechielMan 13:37, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect to Gizmo Project. The added content would help flush out that article anyway. -wizzard2k (C•T•D) 18:09, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:CORP. A redirect per above is ok as well. I hate this notion that a reference in the NYT in and of itself justifies an article - what fallacious reasoning. Eusebeus 13:50, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect as per wizzard2k above. --Kralizec! (talk) 06:31, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect seems reasonable, as they seem to have little notability outside a single product. --Merzul 17:06, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, there are 467 google news articles that mention the company, of which 311 do not even mention Gizmo.[1][2][3] John Vandenberg 06:20, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • That's probably because they launched the Gizmo Project at the end of January this year. [4] -wizzard2k (C•T•D) 06:43, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.