Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SIGFUD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Celestianpower ^háblame 21:47, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] SIGFUD

Probably a hoax. All relevant Google hits are Wikipedia or mirror entries. Delete, perhaps even speedy. — JIP | Talk 05:13, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete but Don't speedy.--Exir Kamalabadi^Esperanza 08:51, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Lacks any form of verification. --Allen3 ^talk 13:31, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN and speedy delete, obvious (well, obvious to any *nix user) hoax nonsense. ~~ N (t/c) 00:02, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

  Wait, that was DG's version I saw there. As to JIP's version, still delete as apparently false. JIP, why did you create this and then AFD it? ~~ N (t/c) 14:04, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

• Comment: JIP, why did you create this article if you think it's a hoax? If all the hits are from Wikipedia or mirrors, how did you get the information to create it? Or am I missing something? — Knowledge Seeker দ 05:55, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete probable hoax. Cool3 19:40, 21 October 2005 (UTC) 19:40, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.