Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SBNN

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KrakatoaKatie 03:33, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] SBNN

SBNN (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

PROD removed by author, so here we are: This apparently web-based publication has no indication of notability and, because of its rather limited circulation, has little chance of gaining notability. The article includes no claims of notability, but speedy deletion was declined because the publication claims to be a magazine. According to the website, though, the first printed issue has yet to be published. —Travis^talk 15:38, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. No reliable sources to establish notability. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 15:40, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

The current website at www.sbnn.co.nr is our old one. It's going to be replaced tommorrow or later today with our new one, which will have SBNN for Download. Jordanrosserthomas (talk) 15:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

That doesn't resolve the issues raised here. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 01:55, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - no reliable sources -- Whpq (talk) 15:58, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - vanity article of zero significance. --AlisonW (talk) 21:47, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.