Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAF Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:50, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] SAF Records

SAF Records (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

{{{text}}} Toddstreat1 00:11, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

NN Unable to find any secondary sources other than commercial placement/mention of product. Plenty of Ghits, but all are promotional.Toddstreat1 00:11, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 23:59, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, one mention in a paywalled NYT article [1] as an indie label. Not much there there. --Dhartung | Talk 01:57, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Does not establish notability for companies due to lack of secondary sources Neozoon 21:39, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per neozoon. —ScouterSig 02:53, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.