Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Süleyman Başak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was was user withdrew nomination (keep). Astrale01^talk_contribs 14:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Süleyman Başak

Süleyman Başak (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Per WP:BIO No assertion of notability. Speedy struck down. Javit 11:50, 9 June 2007 (UTC) Withdrawing nomination per DGG --Javit 00:39, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - clearly fails WP:BIO. --Evb-wiki 13:21, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
  • I'll sponsor the nomination. I still don't see any reliable sources. --Evb-wiki 03:41, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
• Comment resume spam. ~ Infrangible 18:48, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep Inadequate article, but asserted notability as a professor. Expanding the article, he is Associate prof. at the London Business School, a part of the University of London, & of similar quality to the best US Schools. An Assoc Prof. can be notable if he's received enough recognition through publication & citation. He has 17 peer-reviewed papers, one reprinted in an anthology. The highest two have counts of 53 and 44 citations. He's associate editor of 2 good journals, which also counts as professional recognition. But not yet a full professor. DGG 22:51, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

DGG, let me ask you: only 17 articles in a field known for highly prolific authorship? 97 citations on his two leading articles? Why do you think this is notable? I'm genuinely curious, given that you're a librarian. --RandomHumanoid^(⇒) 20:08, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 03:49, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete' Not notable. --RandomHumanoid^(⇒) 20:09, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails WP:BIO. As a procedural note, the afd notice has been off the article since June 10th. I've reinstated it. You might want to keep the discussion open a little longer than normal . - Aagtbdfoua 15:39, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:BIO - G1ggy ^Talk/_Contribs 03:02, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.