Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryl spice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete (patent nonsense) and recreate as redirect to Ryll. howcheng {chat} 07:33, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ryl spice

Hoax, not verifiable, or possible original research J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA  04:43, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Nonsense. Speedy. GeorgeStepanek\^talk 04:56, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete - patent nonsense. —ERcheck @ 05:00, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• comment wasn't sure about tagging as speedy J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA  05:03, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as silly vandalism; G3. As idiotic as it is, I don't see it as utterly patent nonsense; but close. PJM 05:11, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as (mind my informality) total piece of crap. Sycthos^Talk 05:19, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as nonsense.Blnguyen 06:50, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Ryll. VegaDark 07:01, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. A very good example of patent nonsense. --Lockley 07:12, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Ryll, which is what I thought of when I saw the article title. Grandmasterka 07:17, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.