Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Schwehr
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Postdlf 00:15, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Ryan Schwehr
Non-notable college athlete.
From the people who brought you Bryan Schwor, Silly Goose Productions, Mark Soissons, and Neil Vanos...
Ryan "Cameron" Schwehr (1984-) is a semi-famous NCAA runner. He is an NCAA Cross-Country and Track runner from Spokane, Washington. The no-budget movie Bryan Schwor is loosely based on him.
I say, delete this latest vanity attack. --Calton | Talk 12:06, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete unless there is some evidence of him achieving a high level finish (e.g. top 3) in a national level competition (e.g. NCAA championships). Average Earthman 16:28, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. "Vanity attack" pretty much sums it up for me. We got Schwor, we got Schwehr, we got a user with very selective ideas on the rules of this site. Sheesh. These articles are formatted, wikied and even have photos. Seems he missed the part about no self-promotion. - Lucky 6.9 22:08, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. "unless there is some evidence of him achieving a high level finish (e.g. top 3) in a national level competition..." [[1]]--Jim8675309 23:10, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Note: User had 11 edits before this one: 6 to Bryan Schwor-related pages, 2 to Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Mark Soissons, and 3 to his own user page.--Calton | Talk 05:29, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC) (this comment deleted by User:152.163.100.138 [2]
- Delete in spite of that (or put on a list somewhere) until he reaches olympic level. For reason that there are zillions of colleges and each has its own athletes. Radiant_* 09:00, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep For his own sake he does not specifically warrant an article, but due to his relation to the Bryan Schwor movie it is worth keeping. --168.212.165.131 17:30, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- You mean the doomed article with the sock-puppet-infested Vote for Deletion? --Calton | Talk 01:01, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I believe the rule should be this: so long as the Schwor article is up, the Ryan Schwehr article should remain. If anything, he is the only personal affiliated with the film to have noteworthy accomplishments. --Fritz9000 06:46, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, vanity (anon user deleted my vote from here). Megan1967 05:39, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable. --Dcfleck 14:45, 2005 Apr 24 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.