Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Price
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 05:48, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ryan Price
This looks like nothing but a vanity page to me. It also contains plenty of vandalism.Mapetite526 15:54, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: The bottom section (about a high school student) was the vanity part, perhaps written by an individual who wanted to prove he was some sort of stud. Other than that, the rest of the article is about a football player. Do we have some sort of notability standard for football players? --Elkman - (Elkspeak) 16:35, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete Footballer who has never played a first-team game in the top 4 divisions in England. Catchpole 17:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC)- change to weak keep based on Macclesfield Town career. Catchpole 18:50, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep He has played professionally - he was first choice keeper for Macclesfield Town F.C. for a few years, including when they won promotion to Division Two in 1997-98. Oldelpaso 17:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - I'm not British and have no interest in sports, but I do feel professional teams are non-public and wikipedia should be a universal resource for subjects and groups that are in the public eye, world-renowned or not. If it were a private person, or (say) for a pre-college player, I would vote for deletion, but that doesn't apply here. --Chibiabos 18:00, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. Oldelpaso 17:52, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Oldelpaso argument. – Elisson • Talk 18:01, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Professional sportsman. Jcuk 18:35, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep The proper response to a vandalized page is to remove the vandalism not delete the page. Seano1 23:04, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per User:Seano1 and User:Oldelpaso's arguments Lordkazan 20:23, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per the above comments. Yamaguchi先生 23:35, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.