Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Nelson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:09, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ryan Nelson

Ryan Nelson (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article was originally prodded, but unprodded multiple times. One of the unprods yields the comment "can't see why a pure factual article was removed - needs expanding though". Original prod nominator is currently on vacation, so I am nominating this on his behalf.

Personally, I feel this actor is not notable enough to warrant his own article. He had a couple of minor roles in films, including a stint in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix as "Slightly Creepy Boy"). Deathphoenix ʕ 19:30, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, appears to be a minor actor, fails WP:N. Wizardman 19:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Minor roles in minor films; only one major motion picture, and only five roles in six years. If he plays someone we remember, perhaps we can re-add. =David^(talk)_(contribs) 19:37, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - fails WP:BIO - no noteable roles. Only actors who play roles that are significant in the production they were involved in should have Wikipedia articles. He only seems to have been an extra in the Harry Potter film in question. Lradrama 19:41, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Smokizzy (talk) 19:48, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - his roles appear to have been non-notable thus far; WP:BIO doesn't appear to have been met. Tony Fox (arf!) 19:54, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Frag - when his role consists of a description, you know he's not notable. David Fuchs ^(talk) 21:08, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Obviously not notable enough.  Bella Swan_(Talk!) 22:17, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Bang! - not notable enough to warrant a place in the content. -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 05:25, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
• Weak delete unless the "Holby City" role was significant — that show is sort of a British equivalent of ER. If reliable sources are added, I could be persuaded to change my !vote. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 00:35, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.