Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Dollard (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:01, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ryan Dollard (2nd nomination)

Ryan Dollard (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Non-notable subject, and an apparent conflict of interest in article creation. I very much disagree with the previous AFD, whose outcome of "no consensus" was largely based on the nominator (possibly nominating on bad faith as well as disregarding WP:NPA), and a couple of keep votes that were very weak in my opinion. He has done nothing of any significance. —EdGl 21:11, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete: No GNews hits, drastically fails the "100 year" test. Can't find any independent coverage. Chovain 21:45, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Despite the fact that this person has had some press coverage ([1] and [2]) I'm still going with delete since the press coverage has been very trivial, and there's nothing really notable about this person. Jayden54 22:06, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP:HOLE. Seriously. Guy (Help!) 22:18, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete he is a talentless hack. Still, the original nominator was a serious prat though. Rugbyball 15:14, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.