Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Conner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Centrx→talk • 02:46, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ryan Conner

Ryan Conner (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 23:02, 5 August 2007 (UTC) Keep per Corpx. Just about passes WP:PORNBIO criteria 1. Epbr123 12:57, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Tabercil 23:41, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil 23:41, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Having read through WP:PORNBIO, she clearly hasn't won any awards or started any big trends or controversies. Also, the 129 film appearance is a non-criterion.--Kylohk 01:57, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep Nominated for "Best Sex Scene Coupling" (Source) Corpx 04:58, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

• But is one nomination enough to be considered notable? If so, then I have serious reservations... Tabercil 22:31, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

• Strong Delete If only these Wikipedia contributors would think with their brain instead of their genitals. Someone isn't notable just because you enjoyed their smut film. --PEAR (talk) 10:00, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

• Comment this sounds suspiciously like WP:IDONTLIKEIT. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 06:50, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

• Whatever it was, PEAR has been blocked by an admin as a vandalism-only account. Tabercil 22:31, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per above statements. I don't have much to say; just not too notable. — Andy W. ^{(talk/contrb.)} 18:00, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above. She doesn't meet the criteria. Lara♥Love 19:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.