Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rutherford Close

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 00:16, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rutherford Close

Rutherford Close (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This street is not sufficiently notable for inclusing in Wikipedia Pilotbob 05:05, 31 October 2007 (UTC) Pilotbob 05:05, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Nothing notable enough about it to deserve an entry.Alberon 09:40, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Minor street of recent creation. No indication it has more than local importance. Edison 13:10, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - per both of above.   jj137 (Talk) 16:03, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep There is a list of places/locations/etc which have been named in honour of the man and are included on this main page. I think it should be kept. scope_creep 16:18, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.