Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rutgers Against the War

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 00:45, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rutgers Against the War

Rutgers Against the War (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

• Delete the article is of a minor organization at Rutgers University that does not meet WP:N. Any relevant information from this article can be moved to Campus Antiwar Network (which the group is a member of) and the title itself can be made into a redirect to that article. For full disclosure, I am a Rutgers student but have no affiliation with any campus groups. I just found this article via another site and know from my long-time experience here as an admin that it does not meet our current notability standards. The article was also speedy deleted by User:MZMcBride on August 5th.--Jersey Devil 21:57, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as a repost. Campus groups are definitely not notable. --דניאל - Danielrocks123 22:08, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete right cause, wrong place Eleland 22:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Wrong cause, but still the wrong place. Nick mallory 01:29, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Eleland and Jersey Devil. Campus groups can be notable, but not this one. Bearian 01:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Merge to the more notable parent group Campus Antiwar Network. Contrary to what User:Danielrocks123|דניאל - Danielr]] asserts above, student groups CAN be notable, if in fact they are noted by substantial coverage in reliable and independent sources. See Free Speech Movement , Students for a Democratic Society , Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee and even White Rose for notable student groups from past eras. The Campus Antiwar Network has received such notice. The Rutgers group article lacks sufficient coverage for its own article, since most of the coverage is just their campus paper, or blogs, or their own publications. Edison 17:16, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep this article. It is covered by channel 13, if PBS is not a suitable source for relevance, I would like you to tell me what is. I am wondering whether the initial idea for deletion was done by a conservative group at rutgers as a way of furthering a political agenda. I was a member of the organization, but I dont think that my objection isn't justified. Monkeywithsoda 13:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep this article. None of the above requests state any relevant reasons to delete this page. It is informative and does not violate any actual rules. Siegeflan —Preceding unsigned comment added by Siegeflan (talk • contribs) 17:52, August 29, 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Doesn't seem to be much RS coverage of the group itself. Also open to a the suggestion to merge, but this should not be an independent article unless the reliable sources justify it in the future. Cool Hand Luke 22:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.