Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russell F. Roark, III

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Rje 15:43, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Russell F. Roark, III

Prod removed without comment, so bringing here. Flirting right on the edge of notability, but I don't think he quite makes it under WP:BIO - seems like his credits are similar to those a lot of upper-ranking police officers would have. I leave it for discussion. Tony Fox 00:21, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete: Officer Roark appears to be an outstanding public servant who deserves to be commended for his service. Unfortunately, Wikipedia is not the place for that, and I don't see anything notable enough for an article here. --Hetar 00:25, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Agreed, currently nn; maybe someday he will be chief.Congrats on the recent promotion--Nick Y. 00:27, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Hetar. My reasoning exactly when adding the original prod. --Pak21 08:06, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, I agree, doing a good job isn't enough for being notable Optimale ^Gu 08:31, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.