The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep per Davewild. Non-admin closure. --Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 20:54, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Cites no sources, is very biased, full of bad English and bad grammar, is 1 line long. Harland1 (talk) 20:45, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Keep The version nominated for deletion looks to have been the result of vandalism. I have reverted back to a previous version which while needing cleanup is a clear keep. Davewild (talk) 20:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.