Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russ Dalbey
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. W.marsh 17:04, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Russ Dalbey
This article is a pointless advertisement with no sourced claims or neutral references. The article has also been deleted in the past for similar reasons.
Reason the page should be deleted Throktar 08:17, 3 June 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Throktar (talk • contribs) 2007/06/03 08:17:31
-
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:12, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete; fails WP:SPAM, WP:BIO, WP:V. The subject of this obvious infomercial adspam has oodles of Google hits to various bucketshop make-$-now websites, but in five minutes of perusing I couldn't find a single hit to a reliable, unbiased source. There's an assertion that he trained with the Olympic cycling team, but after directed searches I couldn't find any verification of that, or reference to for what group or college he may have raced competitively. This article is the sole Wikipedia activity of User:Rileybuddha, its creator. RGTraynor 13:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Running infomercials is not a sufficient claim to notability. Sources provided are less than reliable. Caknuck 19:27, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - spam, not notable, etc.--Svetovid 20:44, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Do Not Delete - There is no advertisement here. It is factual. The only issue I see is that it has been hijacked from time to time by negative comments—Preceding unsigned comment added by Piper2001 (talk • contribs) — Piper2001 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete - There appears to be no factural information at all and no reason for this page to excist besides the benfit of this guys company. I think this page was created and is being maintained by employees of this guys company.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Franchise42 (talk • contribs) — Franchise42 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Keep Sources: google news. Multiple and independent. Not spam and can be verifiable, just needs some TLC. --h2g2bob (talk) 17:23, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Only one article that's not a PR. The other is borderline trivial. Stellatomailing 00:21, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - promotion. IPSOS (talk) 02:43, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.