Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruse of Fools

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete along with Film Noir (Ruse of Fools album). WjBscribe 17:44, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ruse of Fools

Ruse of Fools (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Band yet to release their first album. No members previously belonged to famous bands. Tagged with {{importance}} since August 2006. Don't reach the heights of being one-hit wonders and seem not to meet WP:BAND's suggested guidelines for inclusion. "Still playing local venues". Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:10, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Clearly non-notable StuartDouglas 15:33, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 01:41, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, nothing that shows this band meets notability guidelines. And as odd as it looks, this is not an April Fool's-related listing. --Coredesat 01:59, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I can see from the relist that it's not intended as a joke, but the coincidence is funny. Yeah, it's a nn band. YechielMan 02:49, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I was going to refrence the day as well (although I've got a few hours before it hits here on the west coast of the US). I can't really find any suitable claim to notability on this one. Darquis 02:53, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Yet another non-notable local band. Realkyhick 05:36, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.