Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Running gags in Friends

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:09, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Running gags in Friends

Running gags in Friends (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article was split off from the main Friends article a couple of years ago. The original version was a list of recurring elements and plot points related to the main characters that bordered on original research. The list has now grown to an indiscriminate collection of just about every single character trait and gag in the series, regardless of whether it is recurring or not. All of the major points already appear in the individual character articles or the parent article and following the deletion of Running gags in Seinfeld for the same reasons I'd suggest that this article goes too. Brad 11:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete could this article BE any more OR? JuJube 12:08, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I agree, anything of true importance is already on the character pages. Johnred32 12:24, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  • "The one where everyone yelled delete."Merkinsmum 12:59, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per my reasoning in nominating the equivalent Seinfeld article in the above-linked AFD. Otto4711 14:14, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per above.   jj137 (Talk) 20:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Original research, absolutely no reason for this to have an article. If there is anything verifiable it should be merged into Friends or one of the character articles--Cailil talk 00:06, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per others. OR, non-notable. Doctorfluffy 06:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete More than succinctly covered at Friends#Running gags. 06:08, 5 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redl@nds597198 (talk • contribs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.