The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedied already. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 14:55, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Delete nonsense. --Ghirla | talk 14:27, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Uhh...
It's not nonsense
That's not a nomination, it's a vote, and not a particularly good one. Please put more effort into your nominations.
This article is a copyright violation in any case, so no worries. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 14:55, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.