Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RuneScape runes (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep --Ichiro 23:19, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RuneScape runes

The reason I've nominated this for deletion is because the information is already listed under the "Runes" section, at RuneScape Items.

  • This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:30, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. The RuneScape items article is already too long and adding the extra info here onto that page would make it even longer. It would be better to move anything included over there to this page and link to it. Evil Eye 15:56, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Marginal keep The RuneScape items article is rather cumbersome. Seperate articles for the more predominant forms of item in RuneScape will enable much more detail to be provided. Have added a link from the runes section to this article. Kcordina 16:22, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I thought the community in general was opposed to having numerous individual articles relating to RuneScape equipment, as per the TzTok-Jad/Fire Cape debacle.

That aside, the RuneScape Items article is hardly what I would call "cumbersome".Mike 20:26, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.