Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rumi maki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as a copyright violation of http://www.rumimaki.com/. Ginkgo100^talk 03:32, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rumi maki

Rumi maki (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Several reasons: first, blatant copyvio - it is word-for-word the text located at www.rumimaki.com, in the "about" section (although the website had "exceeded its data transfer limit" and was unavailable the last time I clicked on it.) Second, is probably non-notable. The history as detailed in the article (and website) attempts to make some connection with ancient martial practices of Peru, but equivocates regarding any direct historical connections. I think if you read between the lines you have Juan Ramon using the term "rumi maki," which apparently has some connection to a Peruvian mythical figure but not directly to any martial arts practice, to apply to his own history of martial training (we can give him the benefit of the doubt that his training involved historical Peruvian martial arts) and founding a new school or style. Due to lack of reliable references, recent creation, and what appears to be a single school, I think this is non-notable. Bradford44 02:45, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletions. Bradford44 02:45, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete db-copyvio, so tagged. JuJube 02:52, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.