Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rulebook

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 17:35, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rulebook

Dicdef Arkyan 06:54, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete can see a good article on the evolution, first use etc... of rule books but this is not a good start --Peripitus (Talk) 07:31, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep Check the history. This article was originally more detailed, but culled to keep it from becoming List of games with rulebooks (but culled a bit too harshly IMO). This could become a good article, and keeping it is unlikely to do any harm. --ais523 09:01, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. A rule book is a book containing rules. If you want to discuss rules, see Game. There's not a lot you can say about the books themselves. -- GWO
• Delete per Peripitus. As for ais523's comment, this is not a good start either. —Caesura^(t) 16:35, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - it's important to give more information because a rulebook is a list of rules. But please give more information by adding details why rulebooks are important. --Bigtop (tk|cb|em|ea) 22:51, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep More is needed to make this moderately relevant or purposeful. Michael 01:13, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep The article has possibilities as something other than a dictionary definition. Don't delete just because it is only a tiny stub now, that has never been the wiki way. How have rulebooks evolved over time for instance? Ansell 06:28, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.