Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudrasankar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Davewild 13:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rudrasankar

Rudrasankar (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Fails to establish notability. Hammer1980·talk 17:25, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

  • This article is valuable.(User: Pompy B)—Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.186.29.13 (talk • contribs) )— 146.186.29.13 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • Comment Not to be confused with "Lord Rudrasankar". Couldn't find any non-trivial mentions of this person. Suspect not notable. Sheffield Steeltalkstalk 00:57, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Poet Rudrasankar is well recognized poet, hence this article is highly notable [Surojit] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.204.30.2 (talk) 01:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - No reliable sources found in Google. Will change to Keep if reliable sources are added -- ¿Amar៛Talk to me/My edits 07:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. The article states that "his poems were published in several leading literary journals and collections of poetry in India, Bangladesh and USA". If the author of the article could list these journals and collections it might be possible to establish notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:32, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete After looking for sources that can establish notability, I have to go with delete. It looks like some people are interested in keeping the article as they have removed the afd tag a number of times and blanked this page. If these parties were to provide some sources from which we can establish notability, I will change my vote. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 01:04, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.