Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rubberninja

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 08:11, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Rubberninja

Appears to be a non-notable vanity page. Evil Monkey∴Hello 02:52, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, possible vanity. Megan1967 03:58, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, almost certain vanity? Peter Shearan 07:47, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Vanity. Do they really call themselves "Flashers"? That just about saps my will to flash (animate, sickos) someday.--ZayZayEM 08:31, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, Looks like non notable vanity. Inter 11:16, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable. Self-promotion. jni 14:29, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, self promotion (rhetorical side comment, not directed at this person- what is it with "flash artists" and their egos, anyway?). Wyss 22:18, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

"Self promotion? Well I wasn't the one who made this wikipedia entry, so I think you're talking crap :)"

• Delete. Omar Filini 07:11, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. How can vanity pages be about notable people? Bart133 (t) 02:18, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.