Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rp Land

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 00:01, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rp Land

Non-notable web forums, prod removed. Unfortunately, we don't have a CSD for nn-websites, so it can't be speedied. --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 00:40, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

wat does that mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sithlord4 (talk • contribs)

Sorry, a lot of jargon in there. Basically, the subject of the article isn't well-known enough to be included in Wikipedia (see WP:WEB for inclusion criteria for websites), and it's not able to be speedily deleted, so we have to go through this process. --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 00:45, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete admits its non-notable in the first sentence.--Crossmr 00:46, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete typical forum vanity, even includes a member list (!!!) Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:57, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete — per nom and above. SynergeticMaggot 00:59, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete... hosted on Invision boards, enough said. Fails WP:WEB. Even includes the obligatory 1337 p05t3rz list. Barely coherent article. --Kinu t/c 01:04, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - self-admitted as not passing WP:WEB -- Whpq 01:10, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Does {{db-group}} apply to internet forums? --Wafulz 01:31, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete I found that the Sithlord4 who asked about jargon in there was the creator of this article and an admin on RP Land. This now is also a vanity article that also has WP:WEB issues. This was prodded, but the aforementioned Sithlord deprodded it, leading to this AfD. His contributions are all related to Rp Land, except for the Mystic Ruins edit. He also once blanked a page (see his talk), but his contribs don't say so. TrackerTV (CW|Castform|Green Valley) 01:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Comment - as the user who caught the blanking, I can assure you that his contribs do say so. It's his second edit to this very page, in fact. There's probably a better template to have used than the vanilla "don't blank pages" boilerplate, but that was the only one I could find at the time. BigHaz 07:40, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.