Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy Hazelwood

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 09:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Roy Hazelwood

This person may be notable, but I'm not entirely convinced. In addition to that concern, this orphaned WP:BLP article has been lacking reliable third party sources since its inception, requesting them at least as far back as September 2007. Contested prod. (jarbarf) (talk) 00:06, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

• Keep. A simple Google search affirms his notability. The article may be taking a long time to be brought up to Wikipedia standards, but deleting it would gain nothing. --MQDuck 00:25, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep. The subject is notable. GoogleBooks gives 213 hits [1] and GoogleNews gives 93 hits[2] including a NYT article regarding him [3] and lots of other sources. The article does need substantial clean-up though. Nsk92 (talk) 01:46, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep as notable per google searches provided. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 03:59, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
• Strong keep - Quite obviously notable. asenine ^{say what?} 08:01, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
• Strong keep - many news articles and Google hits for this person; clearly notable. nneonneo ^talk 00:17, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
• SNOW Keep and people would be well advised to at least do a gsearch before nom to AfD to avoid wasting everyone's time. DGG (talk) 07:41, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.