Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy Ascott

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Notability established, but can and should be edited to ameliorate spam concerns. Eluchil404 16:29, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Roy Ascott

Roy_Ascott (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) -- (View AfD)

This article appears to be self promotion and seems to fail to demonstrate notability. Kevin Murray 10:15, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep seems to be notable according to the San Francisco Chronicle [1]. Could do with a rewrite to remove some of the peacock terms though. Demiurge 15:13, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep seems to satisfy WP:BIO. Tarinth 16:16, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, looks like there are no issues with WP:BIO, a little reworking to make it sound less like an advert would not hurt though Alf photoman 17:46, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep after a re-write; reads too much like AUTO/SPAM as it. SkierRMH 11:52, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per above. Metamagician3000 11:26, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.