Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rough Cuts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. If you wish to achieve consensus on a single article, it is strongly suggested that it be nominated on an individual basis. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:58, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rough Cuts

Rough Cuts (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Also nominating

Rough Cuts Film Festival (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Rough Cuts (TV series) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Rough Cuts (Radio series) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Delete. Every page on Rough Cuts appears to be a hoax except for the film. External links on each article lead to nothing having to do with the supposed topic. --דניאל - Danielrocks123 ^contribs 00:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Comment. The film festival might be legit, but nn. --דניאל - Danielrocks123 ^contribs 00:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete all but keep Rough Cuts (TV series), which seems to be highly regarded.[1] Its host was Michaelle Jean, who now holds an important post in Canadian government. --Dhartung | Talk 02:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge Rough Cuts (books) with Safari Books Online, which is a stub. See also the similar Short Cuts service[2]; they don't all need a page. --Dhartung | Talk 03:52, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
    • I was bold and did the merge. I would move Rough Cuts to Rough Cuts (books) and redirect if considered necessary. --Dhartung | Talk 04:00, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete all per above. I won't comment on the TV series. MER-C 03:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
• Separate out articles. The CBC television series in particular appears to be for real, see e.g. [3], and is likely to be notable and a Keep. On the other hand, there's no evidence of notability for the business, just using a published business model doesn't make a business notable, so Delete Evidence for the film festival and radio program needs to be produced, otherwise Delete. --Shirahadasha 03:39, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep the TV show. Clearly notable multi-season Canadian documentary television show on a major network which (if that wasn't enough) was once hosted by the current vice-head of state. Deletethe others unless notability is proved. This is why multiple AfDs aren't a great idea; the nom has lumped in a very notable subject with three that may not be notable at all. --Charlene 07:56, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep TV Show per above. Delete others... The radio show based on crystal ball, Delete the film festival and Rough Cutson WP:N --Nick Y. 21:35, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keep Radio show based on being officially announced--Nick Y. 20:43, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

• Comment, I have withdrawn my nomination of the Television series because the apparent concensus is to keep that page. --דניאל - Danielrocks123 ^contribs 21:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom except for TV series. Realkyhick 06:54, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. --   ⇒ bsnowball  12:15, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep radio show. I've no idea why it's lumped in with the others, but per the link at the bottom, it's not a hoax (NPR is a fairly reliable source). While the show won't be broadcast for a few months, it has been officially announced on another NPR show, and content is available now in podcast form. --Interiot 04:16, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep radio show. Per Interiot - this is no hoax. --rogerd 12:00, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep all. Rebecca 10:37, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.