This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was
More vanitycruft. With luck this article will be out of here at the tender age of a month. Delete. vlad_mv 21:23, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Or five days, if not sooner. Delete this nonsense. - Lucky 6.9 23:52, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Should have been speedied. Binadot 02:32, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 09:55, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete, vanity article, no useful info. — JIP | Talk 10:27, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete wasn't he an obscure member of the Fantastic Four? Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:30, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, vanity,unnotable etc Tjc 14:36, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.