Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rose Agree (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. This person would be notable, if her claim as world's oldest pornographic actress could be verified. It cannot, as the only source provided gives a minimal listing for her. With so little information available, BLP concerns are also significant in this case. Xoloz 14:56, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rose Agree

AfDs for this article:
Articles for deletion/Rose Agree Articles for deletion/Rose Agree (2nd nomination)
Rose Agree (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No assertion of notability. Does not appear to meet either WP:BIO or WP:PORNBIO. h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 20:09, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete, oldest porn star, but no assertion of notability. Carlosguitar 20:30, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Warning Don't follow the link and look at the picture. <shiver!> MarkBul 21:41, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - I wish I'd heeded the warning <shudder!>. I have to say an octogenarian in porn has to be notable... doesn't it? It's not as if the industry is crawling with them (thank $DEITY). Gotta admit though it's certainly a niche speciality and that meets WP:PORNBIO #3 --WebHamster 01:18, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per WebHamster. (At the risk of making an uninformed decision -- I'm heeding everyone's advice and staying away from the actual page. But being the oldest porn star alive seems to be prima facie evidence of notability to me. --Bfigura (talk) 03:47, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete none of the information one the page can be verified Corpx 05:29, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete unless attribution of notability claim ("oldest porn actress", basically) can be confirmed. --Dhartung | Talk 05:57, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment - It seems it's moot. The article appears to be a copyvio of Answers.com article. On the other hand she does have a page on iMDB. Although I can't find anything that says she is the oldest, there are quite a few links that say she is in her 80s. That alone should meet WP:PORNBIO #3.--WebHamster 18:54, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Answers.com link is a mirror of wikipedia. Honestly, just being an old pornstar is not really being innovative, is it? Corpx 19:05, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Whoops typo, I meant #2 (the first time too). The Asnswers.com article isn't a mirror, there's a paragraph on it that isn't on the WP version.--WebHamster 19:14, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable actress. Keb25 13:05, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.