This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 14:42, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
5 google hits. Probably someone insulting their friend. DJ Clayworth 14:56, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Unlikely to be an article of wide appeal, seems like a very niche topic for a private group of individuals.
Delete. Gaming cruft. jni 07:38, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete not widespread at all. Grue 18:42, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete, poorly written non-notable neologism, orphan, likely a vanity insult. Speedy delete would be okay by me. -- Infrogmation 19:16, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.